I wonder just how long the Serbs & Croats will tolerate the bluehelmets keeping them from giving the Muslims in the Balkans more payback for past rogerings.
They have no lack of know-how and sure seem to have a taste for it. I doubt the bluehelmets could do much about it, other than soak up lead.
I remember standing just over the border into Serbia with a bunch of Serb officers pointing out nice features on their T72's. One of the Majors, not known for being the most diplomatic, responded with "Nifty! Never seen one of these before that wasn't on fire." Sigh...
Mind you, jfruser, we have American soldiers inside Kosovo. Both at Camp Bondsteel and at NATO HQ in Pristine. If Serbia invades with everything, we'd probably withdraw to Camp Able Sentry in Macedonia, which is right by Petrovich International Airport. Best bar in the area is just down the street past the roadblock, a stone's throw from the Macedonian airbase with a bunch of Hind's. Not that I am familier with the current conplans, I was there a while ago.
FYI, Croats hate Serbs more than Albanians. Bosnia wouldn't mind a lil payback as well.
Second FYI, blue helmets were a distinct minority. And I never saw them in numbers outside of Pristine or Ghiljine. Majority of the forces are NATO, under NATO control.
Methinks your info on the Balkans may not be recent.
But yea, if they rolled over the border when I was there, I guarentee you I'd have done more than just "soak up lead". For some odd reason, I don't think many of my coworkers would have stood by and idly died. It would have been interesting to be fighting next to Germans, Finns, Swedes, Swiss, French, British, Polish, Ukrainians, Irish, and Norwegians. We may or may not have been overrun, but we'd have faught before we 'soaked up lead'.
Also, I wonder why they were so easy on the NATO (read: USA) forces the last time 'round. Yeah, a lot of their equipment is old, but it doesn't need to be state of the art where they are fighting to be competitive. It coulda been orders of magnitude bloodier.
Because they didn't have the numbers, logistics or equipment to do so. Genocide is one thing. A full blown war with no real allies is not generally a good idea for a tiny landlocked nation. Closest ally Serbia has is Russia, and that's solely based of racial solidarity and little else. Russia's willing to sell them goods (and not at insanely cheap rates either) and publically 'stand up' for Serbia strictly in a verbal sense. Russia made it quite clear that the Russian military will not back up Serbia.
If we wanted to crush Serbia, we'd simply ask all of the surrounding countries to close the roads and airspace. Then Serbia starves and runs out of fuel in short order. We went relatively easy on Serbia, not the other way around. We bombed some power plants and some military bases, and not much else. We didn't drop all of their bridges and clusterbomb all their roads.
Yea, it could have been bloodier, but it wasn't. Serbia knew its options once NATO stepped in. They ain't that stupid.
http://www.revdisk.net/photos/border.jpg