Author Topic: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.  (Read 9291 times)

Sheng_Pao

  • New Member
  • Posts: 33
Obama is neither sick, perverted, or twisted.

To claim he is such is only distorting our own knowledge about our enemy.

He is actually extremely smart and wily like an old fox who had been avoiding hunters for months.

He knows what is the opium of the masses. And he knows how to keep the masses ignorant regarding grave issues.

Over the years, porn has been one of the greatest brainwashing agents in human history, much greater than opium itself.

Please allow me to explain

When the British imperialists entered China in the 19th century, they forced the Qing Emperor Daoguang to sign a treaty that allows the trade of both porn and opium. The British also sent agents (Chinese traitors) into the dynasty's main armies, to introduce the mostly peasant population in the army to smoke opium and use pornography.

The effects of this can be certainly seen during the Taiping Rebellion. The Taiping rebels failed to overthrow the Qing because the ordinary peasants and soldiers alike feared that they will lose their opium and porn once the Taipings unified the country, destroyed the Qing Dynasty, and kicked the foreigners out of the country. Therefore, in the provinces of Hunan and Huabei, even though they were occupied by the Taiping Army, their citizens still sided with the dynasty. In Hunan, a majority of the peasants joined the Qing forces.
The Taipings also failed to capture Shanghai because the city is mostly run by the puppets of foreign corporations who had been brainwashed and totally dependant on porn, opium, and escorts. Once they realized that the Taipings were a threat to their "freedoms", they raised countless money and funds to help the foreigners fight the Taipings.

The Taiping rebellion occupied vast swaths of China that were NOT under Qing or foreign influence. However, any Chinese at that time who even had a SLIGHT bit of Western influence refused to join the Taiping cause. Most of the Confucian mandarins and scholars sided with the Qing Dynasty in suppressing the rebellion because all of these high class gentry men enjoyed "exclusive luxuries", and by now, you should all know what these exclusive luxuries are. No way were they going to give up their dainty call girls with tiny feet or their treasured opium pipes to live a life of hard work and helping others. No way were they going to give up their nice little opera houses and all of the girls dancing for them.

So what is my point exactly? Has brainwashing done it's damage here?

Pornography was there to stay, and in Guomingdang China, the Zhongyang Zhenfu(Nationalist Government) promoted pornography and many of the funds given to them by the United States, Germany and Britain to equip their armies with modern weaponry were used to hire the best and most exotic prostitutes for their officers. By now everybody who studies political science should know that these funds given to them by the various Western countries were not used to benefit the Guomingdang regime. It was meant for them(the Guomingdang) to purchase objects of moral decadence so these other tiny foreign countries such as Germany, Japan, and UK would finally have a way to control China and it's vast population with only limited military resources. These countries already seen what happened to their forces in Africa when they faced lightly armed but extremely determined fighters. Imperialism pays a tough price. The ones who win the chess game of imperialism wins the jackpot essentially, a nation, it's resources, and unlimited free labor. Those who lose the chess game becomes crushed and broken beyond repair, and they themselves WILL become the target of imperialism by their arrogant and sneery neighbors. This is pecking order on a vast social scale. And it is an example of Social Darwinism being applied so thoroughly that not even a millimeter of land is overlooked.

Please keep reading

So how to control a nation as large as China, with it's vast population, and history and culture so deep that most are willing to die than to be subjected to a foreign rule? Just how? Militarily, any foreign foe would be crushed, despite his technological innovations. Military invasions would stand no chance against an entire citizenry mobilized. Japanese Emperor Hideyoshi lost over 100,000 men in a futile attempt to invade China in 1542.
The modern imperialists are smarter. Brainwashing the citizenry proved to be much more efficient than outright aggression. And the use of porn and opium, two of the most dangerously addictive and detrimental substances in known history, proved to be a snare that many people failed to realize.
Thus a great lion, being shot at and poked at with spears, will charge, roar and decimate his attackers. However, a great lion who has licked a plate of opium laid out for him by cunning trappers, will find the substance extremely satisfying, and he will go after it, seeking for more of that strange substance, until he realizes that he has fallen into the trapper's pit.

When the Communists finally liberated China in 1949, they realized that destruction of the foreign menace will also involve great logistic and educational planning. The root of all the peasant ignorance and their gullibility has to be eliminated first. The opiates of the masses have to be torn up by the roots and burned, and the message has to be sent out to everybody so they will understand if someone is just trying to be their friend or to brainwash them to turn against their own country.

So what is it that I am trying to tell you, my fellow Conservatives?

Barack Obama himself knows the precise and extremely complicated mechanisms of social history. He has even included the words "social darwinism" in his speeches and texts. He understands how to instantly ensnare and control and entire population without losing money and manpower and possibly human lives. He understands how proud Americans are of their heritage, and that most Americans are decended, not only physically but psychologically, from the same stock that stood so valiantly against global tyranny at Lexington, Concorde, and Bunker Hill. Yet, gaining unlimited control of such a populace will elevate him to a new status of power few men have ever enjoyed. Fighting them and trying to conquer them outright will result in horrendous losses for him. As a person who has studied and understood the workings of social darwinism and imperialism and knkow them so intimately, he will resort back to an extremely old and effective tactic. Entice them, lure them, make them smile, make them follow you, make them act on your orders, make them turn against each other, make them believe that if they lose their material goods such as electronic entertainment, they will suffer, so make them buy more. And more. And more. And more. Place more shows onto the media. More Desperate Housewives. More Wife Swaps. More Lost, and American Idol, and Ultra Dance.

They can't fight against that. The founders used their longrifles and cartridge boxes against outright tyranny. How can arms be used against electronic enticement and harmless advertising? Better yet, make all of their children attend public education. It is a perfect chance to turn them against their conservative traditions.

And present American culture is ripe with such potentials. There are Playboys everywhere, and Hustlers, and Howard Stearns. It is just a manner of getting them into peoples' heads more efficiently and making the material more readily available.
However, there is the problem with social mutations. If there is Social Darwinism and Social Evolution, there is Social Mutations. Once a while, you will get the fighter, the resister, the fearless leader. The person who throws away all attempst to brainwash him and return his beloved country to it's roots and traditions. Abnd likewise, brainwashing is so effective, these mutants can also effectively "brainwash" many people to join their cause. At it's peak, the Taiping Movement had almost 5 million fighting members and over 7 million sympathizers. And even though they failed to destroy the Qing Dynasty and it's foreign puppet-string holders, they inflicted a mortal blow to the Dynasty, and the Dynasty did die from it's complications 40 years later.

The solution: get rid of the roots of resistance. As a student of such global political agendas, Obama is aware of Chinese politics as well as 19th century European imperialist tactics. He wants to avoid the mistakes that the imperialist made, and in the meantime, increase his own profits and power.
Imposing gun control is the best solution. Not only restrict guns, but make it so that the already brainwashed population will hate them and loathe them. Therefore, if a Social Mutation occurs sometime in the furture, the mutation will no longer be able to put up a significant resistance.

It is the picture perfect environment to start a dictatorship, twenty-first century style. The raw materials are already there. The elements are already present in the beakers, test tubes and pipettes. All it takes is a mad scientist, an innovative genius, a cunning tactitian, to mix these elements together and at the right proportions to create hellfire.


I want to thank everybody for taking the time to read.
From the Steppes of Mongolia to the Highlands of Tibet
http://www.youtube.com/user/rachen30

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 08:33:09 AM »
What a Load O'Crap.  If this is what self identified 'conservatives' spend their time on, no wonder their political philosophy is in steep decline.

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2008, 09:27:12 AM »
"Social darwinism" is a buzz-word campus lefties use. His use of the word means only he's uneducated, not vice-versa.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2008, 09:28:27 AM »
Quote
Over the years, porn has been one of the greatest brainwashing agents in human history, much greater than opium itself.

It's interesting how the great oppressive regimes of history - the Communists, the Nazis, the Fascists, the Islamofascists, and various others - all tried to destroy pornography and sexual 'perversion'.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas

  • Webley Juggler
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,415
  • All I got is a fistful of shekels
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2008, 11:34:06 AM »
Quote
Over the years, porn has been one of the greatest brainwashing agents in human history, much greater than opium itself.
Two-word rebuttal: Lindsay Lohan. See a recent photo-shoot of her as Marilyn Monroe. Won't post the link, as this is a family-friendly-ish forum. And I don't want to upset anyone's dinner.
The freckles will scare you into a higher moral frame of mind.


Strings

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2008, 12:37:02 PM »
And this is where social conservatives always hit the rocks: wanting to control something that should be nothing more than an aspect of folks' private lives...

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2008, 12:52:13 PM »
And this is where social conservatives always hit the rocks: wanting to control something that should be nothing more than an aspect of folks' private lives...

Amen.  Why I'm a libertarian (little "L").
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,389
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2008, 01:00:34 PM »
Did he say he wanted to control porn, or something? 


Quote
The freckles will scare you into a higher moral frame of mind.
You don't like freckles?  I do.   undecided
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2008, 01:06:30 PM »

The freckles will scare you into a higher moral frame of mind.



I like freckles.. Lindsay Lohan scares me, for as young as she is her party lifestyle has taken its toal on her good looks.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2008, 01:49:00 PM »
I like freckles and red hair on girls.  On guys, they just look creepy.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2008, 02:00:05 PM »
I like freckles and red hair on girls.  On guys, they just look creepy.


I will buy a beer for the moderator that makes this your new avatar!
 laugh
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,389
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2008, 02:00:35 PM »
Aaah, jamis beat me to it.  Drat!   cheesy
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Strings

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2008, 02:08:54 PM »
and I'll match Jamis' offer!

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2008, 02:18:13 PM »
Like I said, creepy.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2008, 02:46:38 PM »
Like I said, creepy.

Which adds to the humor.

Carrot top is one of those really, really bizarre people who's almost funny, but just too freaky to be funny.'
 laugh
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,389
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2008, 06:05:45 PM »
And this is where social conservatives always hit the rocks: wanting to control something that should be nothing more than an aspect of folks' private lives...

Amen.  Why I'm a libertarian (little "L").



OK, can we go back to this?  Social conservatives ALWAYS do X ?   Um, unfair generalization? 

After all, neo-pagans ALWAYS get suckered into worthless, alternative quack medicine.  Right?   undecided

And libertarians ALWAYS have armed stand-offs over unpaid taxes.  Yeah?   undecided
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

wooderson

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,399
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2008, 06:29:38 PM »
It's surprising how little writing (of any quality) has been undertaken about the sex industry. The business practices (the language of domination used in marketing), the sociological milieu of Silicone Valley, etc.. Authors always seem to focus on particular kinks or the viewer at home - the industry itself is relatively unexamined.
"The famously genial grin turned into a rictus of senile fury: I was looking at a cruel and stupid lizard."

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2008, 07:07:25 PM »
And this is where social conservatives always hit the rocks: wanting to control something that should be nothing more than an aspect of folks' private lives...

Amen.  Why I'm a libertarian (little "L").



OK, can we go back to this?  Social conservatives ALWAYS do X ?   Um, unfair generalization? 

After all, neo-pagans ALWAYS get suckered into worthless, alternative quack medicine.  Right?   undecided

And libertarians ALWAYS have armed stand-offs over unpaid taxes.  Yeah?   undecided


I finally figured out your problem, fistful.  You need to classify/categorize everything.  I think you're either OCD or full blown autistic.  Please tell me you drive everyone around you crazy with the need to square papers on the desk, make everything exactly parallel, not step on any cracks, you have all your shirts lined up in the closet by color/design/style, etc.,

or else you need drugs.  And lots of them.

 laugh

Strings

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2008, 07:35:21 PM »
I AM overgeneralizing, fistful, but the point stands: seems that a LOT of social conservatives run aground by wanting to infringe on things that are nobody's business: porn, "gay marriage", etc...

 Is it a problem where EVERY social conservative does it? No... just like not all Democrats are anti-gun. But it does seem that the leadership keeps pushing this stuff, without the rank & file saying "enough is enough!".

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2008, 07:54:14 PM »
Further proof that modern 'conservatism' is adrift, undefined and confused. We now have 'social conservatism' versus 'fiscal conservatism' versus 'compassionate conservatism'.  We've totally forgotten about Samuel Francis, Edmund Burke, Thomas Jefferson, and John C. Calhoun, to name but a few.

You stupid bastards still think Reagan was a conservative.  You wouldn't know conservatism if it jumped up and bit off your balls, if you had any.

Screw it.  You deserve what you get in exchange for your ignorance.

johnster999

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 127
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2008, 09:33:24 PM »
Wow some serious hostility to conservative types in here tonight. I wonder why? Oh yeah. Ron Paul just bailed.

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2008, 09:46:10 PM »
Wow some serious hostility to conservative types in here tonight. I wonder why? Oh yeah. Ron Paul just bailed.

Well, you're obviously new and clueless. Welcome to APS.

johnster999

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 127
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #22 on: March 06, 2008, 09:48:57 PM »
Well, you're obviously new and clueless. Welcome to APS.

Obviously, to have a clue I must agree with you, right?

Thanks for the welcome.

Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas

  • Webley Juggler
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,415
  • All I got is a fistful of shekels
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2008, 02:28:39 AM »
Quote
You don't like freckles?  I do.
See the 'New York Magazine' Spring 2008 Fashion something or other. It's on the internet (like many other frightful things). The freckles make 'er look like a fallout victim or the possessor of a teriffic skin disease. Cloroxed hair doesn't help. As I said, it will scare you into a higher frame of mind.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,389
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Obama:Guns No Porn Yes. My reply to a thread on THR. Please read.
« Reply #24 on: March 07, 2008, 06:23:20 PM »
I finally figured out your problem, fistful.  You need to classify/categorize everything.  I think you're either OCD or full blown autistic.  Please tell me you drive everyone around you crazy with the need to square papers on the desk, make everything exactly parallel, not step on any cracks, you have all your shirts lined up in the closet by color/design/style, etc., or else you need drugs.  And lots of them.

 laugh


OK, with the laugh smiley, I'll assume you're trying to make a joke.  I don't get it.  Huh?


Quote
Further proof that modern 'conservatism' is adrift, undefined and confused. We now have 'social conservatism' versus 'fiscal conservatism' versus 'compassionate conservatism'. 
And that's not coherent, either.  Are you sure you're posting in the correct thread?  Huh?

Quote
We've totally forgotten about Samuel Francis, Edmund Burke, Thomas Jefferson, and John C. Calhoun, to name but a few.
That's an interesting list.  I see you have discovered Wikipedia. 

Samuel Francis indeed rings no bell with me, but from some of his remarks, he appears to have been a sad little racist.  Probably worth forgetting. 

Edmund Burke is a name that has actually been making some surprising appearances on talk radio lately.  Mark Levine and Richard Land both mentioned him within the past couple of weeks.  But, yeah, he's not a household word by any means. 

Thomas Jefferson.  Uh, yeah, OK.  I'm sure he'd be all on board with those smoking bans you like so much.  Oh, wait.  Tobacco farmer.  Oh, wait.  Life, liberty, purfuit of happineff. 

John Calhoun.  A complicated figure.  What do you like about him? 


Quote
You stupid bastards... 
We can keep that in mind the next time you complain about personal attacks.   rolleyes



"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife