Author Topic: Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.  (Read 1967 times)

atek3

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
    • http://www.geocities.com/atek128/Welcome.html
Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.
« on: March 29, 2005, 05:39:07 PM »
LV cops plant drugs in a car, as a "training exercise" for a drug sniffnig dog...Ya, excuse me if I'm mildly skeptical.

atek3





http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Mar-28-Mon-2005/opinion/956026.html
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Mar-25-Fri-2005/news/26152233.html

EDITORIAL: Metro cop planted drugs in suspect's car

Sheriff says suspensions will suffice


There have long been rumors that police canine officers carry around small quantities of contraband drugs which they can use to contaminate a motorist's car, causing their dogs to "alert" on the vehicle and thus justifying an otherwise illegal search of the interior and its occupants.

Many have dismissed such stories as an urban legend.

But what would happen if a group of Las Vegas Metropolitan police officers were actually found to have participated in such an activity? Would all be forgiven with a wrist-slap, if they merely said it was "a mistake"?

While officers were in the process of arresting local resident Mark Lilly last July on suspicion of selling harmless legal substances and claiming they were narcotics, an official police spokesman now admits, canine officer David Newton placed real controlled drugs in Mr. Lilly's vehicle. He has since contended he did so "as a training exercise" for his dog.

It seems pointless to ask whether contaminating active crime scenes is an accepted time, method, or location for a canine "training exercise." A better question might be what Officer Newton was doing carrying narcotics to an active crime scene in the first place. Has he been charged with possession of those narcotics? Were they of a quantity that would get anyone else automatically charged with "possession with intent to sell"?

Police next expect us to believe officer Newton "forgot" he had placed the drugs in the car, whereupon officers Kevin Collmar and David Parker searched the car, found the planted drugs, and charged Mr. Lilly with possession of actual controlled drugs without proper licenses or prescriptions.

To his credit, canine officer Newton subsequently filled out a notice to the prosecutor that he himself had possessed and planted the drugs, and that the charge should be dropped.

But that notice somehow "never made it to the prosecutor," contends Las Vegas Police Deputy Chief Mike Ault, who oversees internal investigations.

Officers Parker and Collmar then proceeded to testify against Mr. Lilly at his preliminary hearing, failing to mention to the prosecutor (or the court, presumably) that the possession charge should have been dropped since the drugs had been planted by police.

Mr. Lilly was ordered to stand trial in District Court. This generally entails considerable expense and inconvenience. Charges were not dropped until officer Jeffrey Huyer notified the prosecution.

Internal Affairs investigators concluded Parker and Collmar "neglected their duty" -- an awfully polite way to put it.

On Feb. 17, the often toothless Las Vegas Police Citizen Review Board found some backbone, recommending these officers be fired because they had filed a false report and lied in court.

But apparently those aren't firing offenses in the department of Sheriff Bill Young. Instead, Sheriff Young said Thursday he will suspend these two officers without pay, since the drugs were not placed in Mr. Lilly's vehicle "intentionally."

Is the sheriff now contending the drugs fell out of officer Newton's pocket accidentally? That he was actually planning to distribute them at a retirement party down at the precinct house later that night? Then what was all that hoo-hah about "conducting a training exercise"? And -- again -- what possible legitimate purpose could a canine officer have for carrying his own narcotics to a live crime scene?

Did we just forget to take our "dumb" pills today?

Joining in this bizarre defense of such police behavior, Las Vegas Police Protective Association President Dave Kallas opines "I am at least glad that the department realized the Citizen Review Board recommendation was extreme and certainly not reasonable."

Mr. Lilly, whose car was auctioned off after it was impounded, insists "It was no mistake. They knew what they were doing. It was a setup."

Sheriff Young's wrist-slap punishment "raises serious questions about the integrity of the entire criminal justice system in Southern Nevada," says Gary Peck, executive director of the ACLU of Nevada.

That's an understatement.

How many other drug busts have officer Newton and his trained pooch helped facilitate? How many have served time after one of these little "training exercises"? How large a stash of contraband drugs does the officer possess, where did he get it, and what's it for? How much will taxpayers end up paying to settle the promised lawsuit from the falsely accused Mr. Lilly?

Sheriff Young and his investigators apparently don't care. Case closed.

DJJ

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2005, 05:48:04 PM »
But don't you understand? They're held to a higher standard. And it's precisely because they're held to a higher standard that they don't need to be subject to the same laws as civilians. I mean, think about poor officer Newton. He's going to have to live with this for the rest of his life. rolleyes

atek3

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 274
    • http://www.geocities.com/atek128/Welcome.html
Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2005, 07:47:48 PM »
hah.

garyk/nm

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 498
  • shovelbum
Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2005, 03:52:54 AM »
While it may be true that Occifer Newton is allowed to possess drugs "for training purposes", I highly doubt that said possession extends to carrying them in public.  Perhaps the DEA can finally be put to good use and use the War on Drugs against this guy.
I hope that the ACLU will jump on this (since there are no guns involved) and extract a measure of justice for Mr. Lilly. Settlement terms should include firing of all occifers involved AND the Sheriff.

Thanks atek3, for getting my blood boiling first thing in the morning.

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Fascism here in the US? Cops can get away with anything.
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2005, 06:22:58 AM »
Holy cow!  What did Mr. Lilly's attorney have to say?
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.