Rule #1 when looking at "something new" in bullet "technology": DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE!!!
- If the idea was so good, it would have been taken up by the major ammo manufacturers long, long ago. They don't invest millions of dollars in research, engineering and production just to keep old technology going, as shown by the vast improvement across the board in ammo over the past few decades. If they haven't thought about it, the odds are pretty good that it's not worth their while.
- If extraordinary claims are made for a bullet, watch for those claims to be borne out by repeatable, measurable, verifiable testing by other ammo manufacturers and the gun rags. If they don't (or can't) do such testing, don't believe the claims.
- If a bullet is claimed to be the best thing since sliced bread for training or self-defence or hunting, watch what the professionals are doing. What are the guys at Gunsite or Thunder Ranch recommending for training ammo? What are the cops using for self-defence? What are professional hunters and/or guides recommending as the best hunting ammo? If these folks are not recommending or using the overhyped new technology, there IS a reason, and it ain't good...