Disagreeing is one thing; promoting the election of a candidate who has repeatedly expressed a desire to eliminate Constitutionally protected rights, and has demonstrated a complete disregard for the rule of law is another.
If someone is stupid enough to think onions taste good, that's ok. If they then support legislation to force me to eat onions, then it's gone beyond disagreeing.
x2 It isn't like I won't associate with them anymore, but it says a lot about who they are IMO.
It is sort of like Global Warming. If someone wants to believe that stuff and just favors research into cleaner burning power plants, nuke plants, or better solar cells, I can compromise with them some and we can all live happily. When they want to establish carbon credits and otherwise destroy my way of life based on that kooky belief, that is when it goes beyond simply disagreement. I am sure there are numerous other analogies, but I'll stop there. If our federal government were following the Constitution and actually had limited powers, it probably wouldn't be an issue. Hillary Clinton democrats are taking it way beyond live and let live.
