Author Topic: The winner of all pathetic Trump replacement scenarios! (Read 1838 times)

K Frame · « **on:** February 16, 2017, 12:33:34 PM »

This one is quite stunning...

Not only does it show a remarkable ignorance of the Constitution and Constitutional law, it also magically creates NEW law

http://www.hannity.com/articles/hanpr-election-493995-493995/liberal-sally-kohn-if-we-impeach-15565014/

K Frame · « **Reply #1 on:** February 16, 2017, 01:37:51 PM »

One of my facebook friends called me out on this...

She's VERY liberal, and was just sure that it was a Sean Hannity Fake News Special!

So I pointed out that the image was taken directly from Ms. Kohn's own twitter feed.

Oh my, the burns... the burns... :)

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #2 on:** February 16, 2017, 02:32:39 PM »

I would dismiss this as tweeting under the influence. But, given Miss Kohn's reputation...

TechMan · « **Reply #3 on:** February 16, 2017, 02:48:25 PM »

I saw that this morning, what an idiot.

grampster · « **Reply #4 on:** February 16, 2017, 03:35:31 PM »

"Sally Rebecca Kohn (born March 27, 1977) is an American lawyer, liberal political commentator, community organizer, and founder and chief executive officer of the Movement Vision Lab, a grassroots think tank." Wikipedia.

Apparently she is CEO of an organization that watches people poop?

T.O.M. · « **Reply #5 on:** February 16, 2017, 04:21:15 PM »

Yeah, I keep seeing more people calling for impeachment, so I reread my copy of COTUS, and can't imagine how an article of impeachment could be drafted. No treason. No bribery. No high crime or misdemeanor. You may not agree with a policy decision by POTUS, but that's a long way from the policy being criminal. And, as I pointed out to one liberal friend, a court declaring the immigration policy unconstitutional does not make signing the act a criminal offense. He and his friends don't seem to get that.

Hawkmoon · « **Reply #6 on:** February 16, 2017, 04:35:21 PM »

Further, the office of the President and the office of the Vice President are two separate offices. It would take some VERY special circumstances to impeach both the POTUS and the VP at the same time -- and even under special circumstances I think it would require two, separate votes to impeach, and two separate trials. She seems to imply that there could be a package deal, impeach and remove both in one action. Considering that the VP is first in line if the POTUS is removed from office, I just don't see how they could possibly be impeached and removed together.

K Frame · « **Reply #7 on:** February 16, 2017, 04:42:00 PM »

"can't imagine how an article of impeachment could be drafted."

SILLY, SILLY violence spewing Nazi man!

The Constitution is a piece of outdated toilet paper written by dead white macroagressing privilege brokers!

It's NOT BINDING because it wasn't written by differently abled social justice warriors with an LBGTIDIQEIEIO self identification!

Trump's high crime and treason is standing in the way of the annointed Empress of the United States! It's taking office! It's keeping the promises that he made on the campaign trail! It's for being Donald Trump!

TechMan · « **Reply #8 on:** February 16, 2017, 04:51:33 PM »

You know Mike, it is really scary how you have that down.

HankB · « **Reply #9 on:** February 16, 2017, 04:57:24 PM »

Quote from: Mike Irwin on February 16, 2017, 04:42:00 PM

"can't imagine how an article of impeachment could be drafted."

SILLY, SILLY violence spewing Nazi man!

The Constitution is a piece of outdated toilet paper written by dead white macroagressing privilege brokers!

It's NOT BINDING because it wasn't written by differently abled social justice warriors with an LBGTIDIQEIEIO self identification!

Trump's high crime and treason is standing in the way of the annointed Empress of the United States! It's taking office! It's keeping the promises that he made on the campaign trail! It's for being Donald Trump!

Uh oh . . . that is clearly a case of virtue signalling . . .

RevDisk · « **Reply #10 on:** February 16, 2017, 05:01:14 PM »

Quote from: Chris on February 16, 2017, 04:21:15 PM

And, as I pointed out to one liberal friend, a court declaring the immigration policy unconstitutional does not make signing the act a criminal offense. He and his friends don't seem to get that.

Shame that wasn't the case, but otherwise somewhere well north of half of Presidents would be impeached. Well, probably not. Usually courts find a piece of a law or policy are found unconstitutional rather than the whole.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #11 on:** February 16, 2017, 09:02:22 PM »

A close second.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/michael-moore-demands-courts-invalidate-2016-election-declare-hillary-winner/

Was he this upset when DOJ failed to even recommend indictment for the actual (not just rumored) crimes committed by Mrs. Clinton?

TommyGunn · « **Reply #12 on:** February 16, 2017, 11:42:37 PM »

Something really bad must have gotten into this nation's water supply

.

RoadKingLarry · « **Reply #13 on:** February 16, 2017, 11:44:42 PM »

Have they spent much time in Flint?

freakazoid · « **Reply #14 on:** February 16, 2017, 11:47:13 PM »

Quote from: TommyGunn on February 16, 2017, 11:42:37 PM

Something really bad must have gotten into this nation's water supply .

I wonder if all the fluoride/chemtrail/etc. conspiracy theorists were actually onto something.

Scout26 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 17, 2017, 12:50:49 PM »

Six impeachments gets us President Mattis...

MechAg94 · « **Reply #16 on:** February 17, 2017, 12:53:20 PM »

Quote from: freakazoid on February 16, 2017, 11:47:13 PM

I wonder if all the fluoride/chemtrail/etc. conspiracy theorists were actually onto something.

I think more than likely it is the echo chamber of the internet and their circle of friends getting further and further out in left field.

K Frame · « **Reply #17 on:** February 17, 2017, 01:00:55 PM »

Given that the Dems are minority party in both houses, I don't think that they could meet the requirements of the succession act no matter what.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #18 on:** February 17, 2017, 01:08:00 PM »

Quote from: Mike Irwin on February 17, 2017, 01:00:55 PM

Given that the Dems are minority party in both houses, I don't think that they could meet the requirements of the succession act no matter what.

It will be interesting, if the stupid party manages to lose one or more houses. Probably just as entertaining as it is now.

News:

Author Topic: The winner of all pathetic Trump replacement scenarios! (Read 1838 times)