No homo?

[Perd Hapley]

Then no job, either.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23089/basketball-coach-says-she-was-denied-job-because-james-barrett

As long as we're going to keep pretending that gay is OK, let's keep racking up these stories about how tolerant that makes our society.

[dogmush]

Seems like going against the faith will get you fired lickity-split.

[Marnoot]

Speaking contrary to prevailing doctrines gets you expelled too, at least across the pond :

http://www.christianconcern.com/our-issues/education/court-rules-student-can-be-expelled-for-quoting-bible-on-facebook

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Hawkmoon]

Speaking contrary to prevailing doctrines gets you expelled too, at least across the pond :

http://www.christianconcern.com/our-issues/education/court-rules-student-can-be-expelled-for-quoting-bible-on-facebook

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

So LGBTXYZQED people are to be protected from potential offense by Christians discussing Christian doctrine, but Christians who might be offended by LGBTXYZQED people expressing promoting a LGBTXYZQED lifestyle aren't entitled to any protection.

Got it.

[Perd Hapley]

I know this might sound like a snarky, rhetorical question, but I'm totally cereal. I seem to remember that we were told back about 10 or 20 years ago, perhaps not in so many words, that if we were offended by seeing two homosexuals hold hands, etc, that it was our problem. It seems like it was something they (the news/opinion/entertainment media) actually came right out and said, but the memory is a little fuzzy. Does that ring a bell with anyone else?

[RoadKingLarry]

Since "sexual orientation" is a protected class does this woman have a EEOC case if she can prove it?
Seems to me that if a LGBTQ type was denied due to orientation they'd have a damn near open and shut case.
Sauce for the goose and all that.

[T.O.M.]

Since "sexual orientation" is a protected class does this woman have a EEOC case if she can prove it?
Seems to me that if a LGBTQ type was denied due to orientation they'd have a damn near open and shut case.
Sauce for the goose and all that.

Did I miss legislation and/or a SCOTUS ruling?  I didn't think orientation was getting full 'protected class" status yet.

[RoadKingLarry]

Not sure myself but I did find this -

https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/wysk/enforcement_protections_lgbt_workers.cfm

Seems it would have to go both ways to be fair.

[Fly320s]

Seems it would have to go both ways to be fair.

Well, this woman seems to go both ways.

[Perd Hapley]

Well, this woman seems to go both ways.

 

[lee n. field]

I know this might sound like a snarky, rhetorical question, but I'm totally cereal. I seem to remember that we were told back about 10 or 20 years ago, perhaps not in so many words, that if we were offended by seeing two homosexuals hold hands, etc, that it was our problem. It seems like it was something they (the news/opinion/entertainment media) actually came right out and said, but the memory is a little fuzzy. Does that ring a bell with anyone else?

Now we're scolded if we have a problem dating "women" with the wrong equipment.

[Doggy Daddy]

Seems like going against the faith will get you fired lickity-split.

ISWYDT!

[Perd Hapley]

Now we're scolded if we have a problem dating "women" with the wrong equipment.

Exactly. No safe space for the normals.