Author Topic: Seattle beverage tax  (Read 3763 times)

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,190
  • ohhh sparkles!
Seattle beverage tax
« on: January 07, 2018, 11:21:21 AM »
I must be bored, been reading Seattle's gov site about their shiny new tax. Of course when it fails, blame very other locality like Virginia has always been blamed for every gun crime in the entire northeast. And by fail I mean destroy business.

First, it is a tax at the distribution level and their abstract says it is not meant to be passed on to the consumer. Yeah, right, fail economics much? More cynically, the writers know it will be, creating a new class of political enemies to blame, those evil businesses!

I saw an exemption for products of companies with less than 2 million gross world-wide sales. So hipsters and your soda you've probably never heard of, safe.

That and other exemptions it is obviously targeted at mass market soft drinks only. I believe like similar assault laws they tax concentrate going to restaurant soda fountains, still reading.

Now, do they tax the feedstock for Starbucks drinks? I think come and Pepsi ought to sue the city. Everybody ought to sue the city. It is a regressive tax on the things those poor people drink.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,982
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2018, 12:38:04 PM »

Now, do they tax the feedstock for Starbucks drinks? I think come and Pepsi ought to sue the city.

That's a really good question. Seems like it's a toss up on if Starbucks drinks or soda are worse for you. I'm thinking your average Starbucks drink has three times the calories (and maybe sugar too) of a can of sody pop. You could maybe even say that about the sugar content of many of the "health juices" out there.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2018, 12:47:25 PM »
I can't wait for seattle PD to strangle a guy for selling "loose" sodas...
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

lee n. field

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,572
  • tinpot megalomaniac, Paulbot, hardware goon
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2018, 01:22:51 PM »
That's a really good question. Seems like it's a toss up on if Starbucks drinks or soda are worse for you. I'm thinking your average Starbucks drink has three times the calories (and maybe sugar too) of a can of sody pop. You could maybe even say that about the sugar content of many of the "health juices" out there.

I like a cafe mocha sometimes, which is (IIRC) 400-ish calories.
In thy presence is fulness of joy.
At thy right hand pleasures for evermore.

AmbulanceDriver

  • Junior Rocketeer
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,931
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2018, 03:13:44 PM »


I just wish Costco had called it the City of Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax (Because that's, in fact, what it is... not a "fee")
Are you a cook, or a RIFLEMAN?  Find out at Appleseed!

http://www.appleseedinfo.org

"For some many people, attempting to process a logical line of thought brings up the blue screen of death." -Blakenzy

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,190
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2018, 03:56:27 PM »
The packaged Starbucks brand drinks will of course get nailed, but the main question is rhetorical, if you doubled the over the counter cost of a half frappe super latte grande turbo mocha espresso the people would out with pitchforks. And of course not biting the corporate hand that feeds.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2018, 03:56:53 PM »
Everybody ought to sue the city. It is a regressive tax on the things those poor people drink.

And since it's per ounce rather than a percentage of the price at any stage of sale, it's even worse on the cheap ones us really poor people drink.  I just picked up a couple 2 liter Dr Thunder Cherry sodas for $0.60 each.  A $0.02/oz tax would have added $1.35 each.  225% extra just for that tax alone.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,996
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2018, 04:05:55 PM »
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/retail/costco-suggests-shoppers-go-to-tukwila-to-avoid-seattles-sugary-drinks-tax/

Costco thinks you should buy your sweetened drinks outside of the Seattle city limits.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,982
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2018, 04:26:24 PM »
The packaged Starbucks brand drinks will of course get nailed, but the main question is rhetorical, if you doubled the over the counter cost of a half frappe super latte grande turbo mocha espresso the people would out with pitchforks. And of course not biting the corporate hand that feeds.

That's what I was actually wondering -- is there a tax on the Starbucks drinks when you go in and order at the counter? I'm just curious if they, or Jamba Juice and whoever get a break from applying the tax. I could see Seattle SJWs being happy with the soda tax, but if their coffee specialty drinks at the bajillion coffee shops there double as well, will they rise up, or will they be cool with that too?
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

castle key

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 615
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2018, 06:41:48 PM »
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/promoting-health-at-a-hefty-price-seattles-soda-tax-starts-jan-1/

"But not every dollar will reach Seattle families. Only $400,000 of the tax revenue set aside for Fresh Bucks in 2018 will be spent on produce vouchers."

"The rest of the $2 million for Fresh Bucks is aimed at administrative costs, such as outreach, technology and hiring five additional city employees to carry out the program’s expansion."


As this "fee" is based on volume, not price, and the poor and minorities have been found to use larger amounts of sugary drinks, this is clearly a regressive tax. Regressive taxes are the bane of liberals..... how can Seattle justify that?!

The article certainly explains that while the "fee" is designed to address health concerns, it actually puts more of the collected "fees" into administrative costs such as hiring more "fee" collectors.
Vigilate hoc, tenendum per ebrietatem.

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2018, 07:37:43 PM »
The article certainly explains that while the "fee" is designed to address health concerns, it actually puts more of the collected "fees" into administrative costs such as hiring more "fee" collectors.

That's because the more taxes you charge, on more specific things, the less efficient taxing becomes.

I remember reading that, at least before fast-pass systems dominated, the cost of running toll operations often exceeded 50% of collections, meaning that more of the money you paid went towards making you pay money than maintaining the road or bridge the toll was intended to fund, making it an extremely inefficient means of funding infrastructure.

That said, they did close the biggest loophole by making it so that retailers transporting their own syrup boxes would still be taxed by considering them distributors (really, I buy half a dozen boxes of syrup for my own store/restaurant and I'm a distributor?). 

They're trying the same 'hide it from the customers' by charging the tax to the distributors, and missing the same deal that while the tax isn't that big of a deal if you're buying the smallest sizes single-serve(which has the highest profit margins), there's no way in hell that bulk soda purchasers aren't going to see a 50% or more increase in price.

But then left a lot more loopholes open for customers.  Especially the small sales deal.

I figure that:
1.  This will cost them money, because as MillCreek says, people will shop outside of the city limits instead, and once they're doing that, they'll avoid other city taxes as well buy buying in bulk as long as they're there.  Revenues will be no where near what was expected.
2.  Evasion is going to be rampant, given that they left more loopholes open.  I figure on a number of methods.
a.  Blended 100% fruit juices are now cheaper than soda.  Not really any better for you, but cheaper.   I wonder if carbonated still counts as 100%?  You might be able to come very close with the right 100% fruit juices if you get tricky.  I'm sure there's some 'fruit' that is close to 100% sugar if you squeeze it right.  What about V8, liquid vegetables, not fruit?
b.  Return of the soda shops.  You know, tiny joints that mix their own?  They have an exemption.
c.  Chocolate milk and such.  That might be healthier, might not.
d.  diet sodas are now substantially cheaper.
e.  For gatorade type drinks, those pouches where you buy a bottled water then empty a powder into them.  As far as I know, the powders aren't taxed.
f.  For things like sweet tea, I can see them switching to you buying unsweet and getting a pouch/baggie of sugar if you want it sweeter.

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,256
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2018, 07:42:03 PM »

The article certainly explains that while the "fee" is designed disguised to address health concerns, it actually puts more of the collected "fees" into administrative costs such as hiring more "fee" collectors.

Fixed it for you.

Socialism at work. More good little bureaucrats sucking at the government teat. A liberal's wet dream.

Lemme see -- $2 million minus $400,000 leaves $1,600,000. How much will they spend waste on "technology" and "outreach"? $600,000? So that leaves a cool million bucks to hire five (5) "fee" enforcers. $200,000 / year isn't a bad salary for essentially doing nothing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2018, 08:01:36 PM »
Fixed it for you.

Socialism at work. More good little bureaucrats sucking at the government teat. A liberal's wet dream.

Lemme see -- $2 million minus $400,000 leaves $1,600,000. How much will they spend waste on "technology" and "outreach"? $600,000? So that leaves a cool million bucks to hire five (5) "fee" enforcers. $200,000 / year isn't a bad salary for essentially doing nothing.

It's a double disguise.  The 5 extra employees aren't fee enforcers.  They're to 'expand' the fresh food program - get it into more schools or something like that. 

The enforcers are higher up in the chain, and while the tax is supporting all sorts of 'for the children' feel good programs, it's all penny-ante stuff.

Philly is trying this as well, but Cook county found so much pushback it was repealed.  I figure the same will probably happen elsewhere, though in some cases it might take a year or so to get the politicos out of office.


Jim147

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,592
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2018, 08:12:16 PM »
Come on guys it's not a tax on the people the distributors will eat that $2.52 on every 12 pack of soda.

Are the politicians that poor at economics or do they think the people that elected them are this stupid?
Sometimes we carry more weight then we owe.
And sometimes goes on and on and on.

BAH-WEEP-GRAAAGHNAH WHEEP NI-NI BONG

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,256
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2018, 08:40:47 PM »

Are the politicians that poor at economics or do they think the people that elected them are this stupid?

Yes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2018, 10:20:36 PM »
Are the politicians that poor at economics or do they think the people that elected them are this stupid?

They believe their own hype.  Group think writ laws.
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,625
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2018, 01:05:43 AM »
. . .
Philly is trying this as well, but Cook county found so much pushback it was repealed . . .
Hadn't heard of the Cook County repeal. A bit more than a year ago I was in Chicago for a funeral, and my cousins told me that almost everyone who lived within a couple of miles of the county line had begun shopping just OUTSIDE Cook County. A VERY sharp decline in sales - and hence, revenue - of grocery stores within Cook County (Chicago) resulted, because when people went outside the city for soda, they bought the rest of their groceries (and filled their gas tanks) outside the city, too.

Surprised they dumped the law rather than file lawsuits against the "out of county" grocers.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,249
  • I Am Inimical
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2018, 08:37:04 AM »
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/retail/costco-suggests-shoppers-go-to-tukwila-to-avoid-seattles-sugary-drinks-tax/

Costco thinks you should buy your sweetened drinks outside of the Seattle city limits.


Oh my God... WHY didn't they get a quote from someone on the city council? I bet that would have been absolutely epic schaedenfreude... "HOW DARE THEY SUGGEST THAT PEOPLE AVOID PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE!!!"
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,249
  • I Am Inimical
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2018, 08:38:58 AM »
"Regressive taxes are the bane of liberals..... how can Seattle justify that?!"

Because if there's one thing that liberals "know," is that they know how to live your life better than you do. Espeically if you're poor and/or undereducated. Then it's mandatory (in their eyes) that you STFU and do what they say and vote for them blindly.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2018, 08:45:05 AM »
I wonder how long till some municipality or state makes it a punishable offense to shop outside your city/state?

Don't the veracity but I've heard that some California liberals have talked about implementing an "exit tax"  for people that move away from the great state of Commiefornia
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,249
  • I Am Inimical
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2018, 08:59:35 AM »
"I wonder how long till some municipality or state makes it a punishable offense to shop outside your city/state?"

How many states with monopolies on liquor sales already pull that crap? I know of several, and I bet there are a lot more.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2018, 09:06:17 AM »
"I wonder how long till some municipality or state makes it a punishable offense to shop outside your city/state?"

How many states with monopolies on liquor sales already pull that crap? I know of several, and I bet there are a lot more.

Yup. Utah would prosecute if they caught you coming back in with beer from out of state (%3.2 beer state). 
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,982
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2018, 10:16:09 AM »
CA has now made it illegal to get your ammo out of state (without going through a CA FFL).

I'm still not sure how you implement a "you may not purchase [widget X] outside of [Y] city, county, state jurisdiction. At least for portable goods. Seems the only way you could enforce it to any degree is through police state methods.

They could, of course, "make examples" of the 1 in 100 they might catch without going full police state, but otherwise, whether it's a couple of cases of soda or ammo in the trunk, good luck enforcing your ban. Example=marijuana.

To add: I'm betting the Seattle city council gives a thumbs up to pot legalization. Please explain how pot is better for you than soda. Or soda is worse for you than pot. Through the whole pot legalization debate, I have always found it kind of funny that so many of the "pro pot" people are extremely anti other tobacco products, let alone other legal stuff like sody pop.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

BobR

  • Just a pup compared to a few old dogs here!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,272
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2018, 11:23:39 AM »

To add: I'm betting the Seattle city council gives a thumbs up to pot legalization. Please explain how pot is better for you than soda. Or soda is worse for you than pot. Through the whole pot legalization debate, I have always found it kind of funny that so many of the "pro pot" people are extremely anti other tobacco products, let alone other legal stuff like sody pop.

I wouldn't take that bet for anything.

http://www.krem.com/news/us-to-end-policy-that-let-legal-pot-flourish/504870679

Here's a random thought, maybe this is a way that the Trump administration is trying to force the issue through Congress. Take pot off of the Schedule 1 list and treat it like alcohol. Could it be he (Trump) expects Congress to address issues they have been sidestepping for years?

bob

TechMan

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,562
  • Yes, your moderation has been outsourced.
Re: Seattle beverage tax
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2018, 11:25:20 AM »
Yup. Utah would prosecute if they caught you coming back in with beer from out of state (%3.2 beer state). 

Ohio has done that on occasions.  Since we live in Cincinnati, it is really easy to run down to Kentucky to The Party Source and pickup up your beverage of choice with out having to go to a state store.

Quote
Hawkmoon - Never underestimate another person's capacity for stupidity. Any time you think someone can't possibly be that dumb ... they'll prove you wrong.

Bacon and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig.
Stupidity will always be its own reward.
Bad decisions make good stories.

Quote
Viking - The problem with the modern world is that there aren't really any predators eating stupid people.