Author Topic: Apps cost too much? Court allows suit adding to Apple’s woes  (Read 422 times)

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,701
https://apnews.com/9e09bdac11b947b8877613a3a3fb192d

https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/05/opinion-analysis-divided-court-allows-antitrust-lawsuit-against-apple-to-continue/

Quote
The Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick, Kavanaugh explained, “established a bright-line rule that authorizes suits by direct purchasers but bars suits by indirect purchasers.” Here, it was clear to Kavanaugh (as well as to Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who joined his opinion) that the iPhone users were direct purchasers from Apple and therefore could bring an antitrust lawsuit against the company, because they “bought the apps directly from Apple.”

I need to look into this a little more as it got me curious.  I am not sure I disagree with Kavanaugh's opinion, but I am not really sure why there is an anti-trust lawsuit in the first place.  Do they think Apple is profiteering off their closed network of apps?  Considering major market alternatives are available, I am not sure why this would be a monopoly.

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/apple-v-pepper/?wpmp_switcher=desktop
This has more Scotusblog links.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge