Author Topic: NAU, towards a New World Order  (Read 6359 times)

LAK

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
NAU, towards a New World Order
« on: October 11, 2007, 02:46:32 AM »
Here's Fox out of the closet; when reading this and viewing the videos (on actual webpage), keep in mind that this is the man George W. Bush signed an agreement with, along with Paul Martin (Canada), without Congressional approval on a number of important issues which are a key part of an agenda to create a political union awhile back. This while the "republican" and "democrat" leadership didn't so much as open their mouths.

Keep in mind that a vote for any "republican", "democrat", "Libertarian" candidate other than Ron Paul in the coming coming election is a vote for this now very open agenda to homogenize the globe.

Also keep in mind that it is not some trumped up "criminal activities" that set countries like Venezuela apart - it is their resistance to this agenda for global government.

-----------------------------------------

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/fox_vicente_calls_for_north_american_union.htm

Vicente Fox Calls For North American Union
Calls for immigration reform in U.S. then admits plan for single NAFTA currency
Infowars.net | October 10 , 2007
Steve Watson

 In a series of interviews to promote his new book, Revolution of Hope , former Mexican leader Vicente Fox has trumpeted rampant globalization and has declared anyone who opposes such "harmonization" and diminishment of sovereignty "racist" and "xenophobic".

Over the course of a week Fox has called for a North American Union, a single North American currency and a complete overhaul of the U.S. immigration policy to allow more Mexicans to legally enter the country.

To the wild cheers of the Daily Show audience Fox called for U.S. immigration reform stating "It's my impression that fear is guiding public opinion here and xenophobia. They are thinning the space because Congress has not decided yet, it is a hundred year old issue, immigration, and I think they can come up with a very wise solution to immigration because it's a win-win situation, everybody will be better off."

When asked if he supported globalization through NAFTA, Fox responded:

"Yes, absolutely, NAFTA has been good, as a matter of fact we should have a new vision, go further, integrating and working together to build a better future for both.

"That happened with Spain and with the European Union with them joining the union and having access to those huge cohesive bonds, they were able to overcome poverty and today Spain, or Ireland or Greece or Portugal are all very successful nations, what you need is a little bit of solidarity."

Stewart then went on to ask "Would you like to see a North American Union with the U.S. Mexico, and Canada, you want Canada in there?"

To which Fox responded "Yes long term, yes."

Fox also criticized the Venezuelan and Bolivian leaders who have vowed to resist any form of globalizing union of the Americas, calling them "terrible people" to the rapturous applause of the audience.

However, John Stewart and his audience had previously cheered and fawned over Bolivian leader Evo Morales, when he appeared on the Daily Show, telling him that U.S. politics is "rigged" and applauding his achievements in redistributing wealth in Bolivia.

Though the respective leaders of Bolivia and Venezuela are far from perfect, it is clear that their popularity amongst their own people has come due to the fact that they have managed to offset centuries of repression, occupation and dictatorship supported by their country's wealthy elite and right-wing oligarchies with the backing of the U.S. and other western governments.

Chavez and Morales are fiercely patriotic leaders whose protection of their own country's sovereignty is a constant thorn in the side of the globalizing and nation plundering elite, who refer to them as dictators when they are anything but.

Vicente Fox also made an astounding admission last night on CNN's Larry King Live when he acknowledged the plan for a North American single currency, a "euro-dollar" as King labeled it.

In yet another separate interview Fox also stated that he believes "racists" are preventing increased immigration into the U.S.:

"The xenophobics, the racists, those who feel they are a superior race ... they are deciding the future of this nation," he said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Figures like Vicente Fox are adept at selling globalization to the public, promoting goals such as the North American Union as simplistic happy go lucky agreements that will touch everyone and enable us all to live in harmony, without any borders or divisions.

Yet in reality such forces of globalization are geared to benefit only the rich Western elites who propose them. They are geared to merge economies and bring them further under private corporate control.

Such "harmonization" is not designed to enhance freedom of movement, but instead to restrict and control the movement of people through increased security, surveillance and tracking. It is designed to facilitate the increased plundering by global corporations of the infrastructure, valuable commodities and land belonging to the people of nations in order to maximize private wealth and diminish the free market. It is designed to indenture debt and dependence on global bodies such the IMF and the World Bank who act as nothing more than huge loan sharks.

The globalist movement represents the very antithesis of a rich, culturally diverse, healthy, competitive and prosperous society. In an insatiable drive to satisfy the elite's desire for more, it seeks instead to eliminate such traits, to widen the rich/poor divide and to grind the under classes together into one exhausted and depleted mass of chowder.

Which is why although you will see figures like Vicente Fox triumphing the plan for a North American Union with a single currency, the corporate media still denies it's existence and the implementation of the agenda must be an "evolution by stealth" as recently released Security and Prosperity Partnership documents (PDF link) admit.

Related: Scholars explain president's plan for a North American Union

"The most important feature of the SPP design is that it is neither intended to produce a treaty nor an executive agreement like the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) that would require congressional ratification or the passage of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was designed to function within existing administrative authority of the executive branch."

- Hudson Institute White Paper: Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership


Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2007, 02:55:57 AM »
Quote
In a series of interviews to promote his new book, Revolution of Hope , former Mexican leader Vicente Fox has trumpeted rampant globalization and has declared anyone who opposes such "harmonization" and diminishment of sovereignty "racist" and "xenophobic".

Mexico needs a real revolution.
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2007, 06:19:53 AM »
No, they are bringing Mexico to us. grin

Get ready to buy those Ameros, you New World Order inmates. grin
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Racehorse

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2007, 06:29:55 AM »
I don't know if any of you guys listen to Glenn Beck, but he's been talking about the North American Union for months now. There are lots of things going on that make it seem like they're definitely pushing for a union. One of the recent things he's been talking about is the issue with Medellin (an illegal who committed murder in Texas) and its impact on our legal system. It's interesting.

Edited to add link: This is an interesting discussion Glenn Beck had about this whole thing.

RadioFreeSeaLab

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,200
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2007, 07:23:21 AM »
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/016039.html
Mike Gravel says no world government = "Bad Thinking"

Paddy

  • Guest
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2007, 08:15:48 AM »
I started a thread on this before, and it just wound up being a shouting match with the 'free marketers'.  They see no problemo with subordinating our national sovereignty as long as consumer prices stay low and the corporations make profits.  It's all about the bottom line, nothing more.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,619
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2007, 02:20:01 PM »
Opening economic ties is one thing.  One world govt is quite another.  I don't think a world govt could function without being inherrently tyrannical.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

LAK

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2007, 10:27:25 PM »
RileyMC,

Don't feel bad; I have been posting about this for a number of years along with overlapping subjects. In attempting to point out the early signs of all this when NAFTA was still somewhat "new" I was derided quite often.

It should be down to a shouting match at this stage, albeit most effectively at state legislative and federal congressional level, in session, because once this becomes "in place" our country is going to be reduced to a mere province - just another neighborhood in the global village, and most people reduced to just another worker on the big plantation. If we do not grab this bull by the horns and slay it very soon, it is going to run right over us. This is more important than any other current issue since once it becomes a reality the others will no longer be subject to our control - as limited as that is already.

We already have a candidate who would ax this beast cold in one stroke of a pen - that would be Ron Paul. The others are not going to do it.

-------------------------------------------

http://searchronpaul.com
http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org

Antibubba

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,836
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2007, 12:13:46 AM »
Standing Wolf said:
Quote
Mexico needs a real revolution.

And Fox knows this.  If we were to seal the border, all of Mexicos citizens who desired a better life would be forced to direct their discontent at their own government.

We are Mexico's safety valve.

And if anybody still wonders why Bush allows it, consider that we get more of our oil from Mexico than anyone except the Saudis, then look at the "unrest" in Chiapas--the Zapatistas are Communist.  Imagine Chavez and Castro combined, right on our southern border.  Also imagine how many Mexicans will try to get in THEN.   sad

Damned if we do, damned if we don't.
If life gives you melons, you may be dyslexic.

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2007, 12:42:01 PM »
So what happens to Mexico if they don't sell us oil?  They sell it to someone else who is willing to deal with us.

The same global market that has hosed shooters with high lead & copper prices will keep a Mexican embargo of oil from hosing us.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

stevelyn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,130
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2007, 03:37:18 AM »
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/016039.html
Mike Gravel says no world government = "Bad Thinking"

I'm ashamed that Mike Gravel ever called himself an Alaskan.
Be careful that the toes you step on now aren't connected to the ass you have to kiss later.

Eat Moose. Wear Wolf.

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2007, 04:10:14 AM »
Maybe, but soon you will not have to worry about being an "Alaskan" as you will be a World Citizen. grin
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Art Eatman

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,442
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2007, 06:33:26 PM »
With the exception of Scandinavia, the Benelux and Germany, few countries' governments now could really be said to be in control of the whole country.  I fail to see how anybody could possibly believe that a one-world government could function.

I can see the benefit to Mexico from this NAU.  I see no benefit to Canada or the U.S.; only detriment.

Some parts of the NAFTA treaty were ill-advised, IMO, once you get away from the tariff issue.  But jobs were leaving the U.S. long before NAFTA.  By the early 1970s, observers of business and industry were talking about the end of the Industrial Age in the U.S., and the beginning of the Information Age.  That has certainly happened, has it not?  And was not NAFTA signed during the 1990s, by Clinton, some twenty years later?

And our exports to Mexico immediately increased after NAFTA was signed.  U.S. workers made whatever products were exported--including Dodge Ram pickups, which are quite popular down there because of their "machismo" appearance.

Art
The American Indians learned what happens when you don't control immigration.

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2007, 04:52:26 AM »
Dodge pickups are "Hecho en Mexico."

Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: NAU, towards a New World Order
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2007, 12:20:20 PM »
I still fail to understand why the US did not invade Mexico instead of Iraq Huh?

If we're going to start wars against weaker countries, we should start ones that might actually benefit us.  Mexico needs a "regime change" and after they have been occupied territories for a while and learned democracy, they could start applying for statehood. Smiley

Besides, Mexico has oil, and the commute is a lot shorter  laugh
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin