Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: TommyGunn on April 22, 2013, 12:45:51 PM

Title: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: TommyGunn on April 22, 2013, 12:45:51 PM
What Obama doesn't want on the streets of America (unless they're in the hands of govt. bees). :lol:
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: Tallpine on April 22, 2013, 12:54:15 PM
It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 22, 2013, 02:28:00 PM
 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Exactly. If they really believed that "weapons of war don't belong on our streets," they'd confiscate the very guns they actually have Constitutional authority to confiscate, and give them back their revolvers and shotguns.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: SteveS on April 22, 2013, 03:20:29 PM
Just another example of guns for me, but not for thee.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: castle key on April 22, 2013, 04:07:14 PM
"Shelter in place" is simply a softened term describing Martial Law.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 22, 2013, 07:40:45 PM
Diane Feinstein was asked about whether it may have been a good idea for Watertown residents to have guns, while the mad bomber was at large. She basically said yes, but not "assault weapons."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGVjZ-gmNTY#t=8m58s

The interviewer failed to ask why not, when the police were using them.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: erictank on April 23, 2013, 06:29:40 AM
Diane Feinstein was asked about whether it may have been a good idea for Watertown residents to have guns, while the mad bomber was at large. She basically said yes, but not "assault weapons."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGVjZ-gmNTY#t=8m58s

The interviewer failed to ask why not, when the police were using them.

Because it makes perfect sense for private citizens, who do not have body armor, select-fire weapons, and a radio connection to armed, trained, and rapidly-available backup in the event of a criminal attack, to be restricted to artificially-low-capacity and low-power weapons for defensive purposes against such an attack, of course!  :facepalm:
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: Tallpine on April 23, 2013, 11:11:00 AM
If I was in Boston, I would have just stepped out on the porch and fired my shotgun into the air  :angel:
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: SADShooter on April 23, 2013, 02:29:02 PM
If I was in Boston, I would have just stepped out on the porch and fired my shotgun into the air  :angel:

Twice.
Title: Re: NOT on OUR street!!!!!
Post by: Tallpine on April 23, 2013, 03:08:04 PM
Twice.

Of course!  It's one of those high capacity double barreled shotguns.