So, Mak, what you're saying is that by going on a business trip, and leaving my safe and contents behind, this bill would define the acrus as a sale of my firearms and require that I do an FFL transfer to my wife? Then, when i return, she would have to do an FFL transfer back to me? And, if we take a trip together, and her parents come stay with the kids, I have to do a transfer to the in-laws, and then back again when I return? That would be assinine.
If the bill is as I remember, yes. Though the bill does not require simply all sales go through an FFL. All TRANSFERS have to go through an FFL. It doesn't have to be defined as a sale, it was a transfer. (Thus, any gift, inheritance, etc... has to be done through an FFL.)
And it was written by Chuck Schumer. Of course it's asinine. (Although your spelling it probably a better description of Schumer.)
